Image: Business Insider

UpTrajectory Review

The advertising industry has stumbled into a collision between two of its favorite buzzwords: AI and native advertising. Time magazine, working with adtech startup Mobian, began serving stripped-down, text-only pages to AI crawlers while showing human readers the standard experience. These 'Agent Ads' present FAQ-style brand messaging that chatbots might ingest and repeat, effectively turning publisher authority into a backdoor SEO play for the generative AI era. Perplexity, the AI search company, has now declared it will treat this practice as 'cloaking'—a term search engines have used for decades to punish sites that serve different content to bots versus people—and warned publishers they risk downranking.

For small-business operators, this matters because the ground is shifting beneath how customers find you. If you have been investing in traditional search optimization, the rise of AI answer engines already threatens to bypass your website entirely. Now a parallel economy is emerging where brands might pay publishers to influence what AI systems say about them. That could mean your larger competitors buy their way into favorable mentions inside ChatGPT or Gemini responses, while your business depends on organic accuracy. The Perplexity pushback offers temporary relief, but the underlying arms race will not stop here.

What deserves scrutiny is Mobian CEO Jonah Goodhart's framing that these ads are 'clearly labeled' and 'the opposite of deception.' The labeling claim is technically true for the bot-facing pages, but the entire architecture depends on humans not seeing what bots consume. Perplexity's Jesse Dwyer cuts closer to the bone: if the content is genuinely useful, why hide it from people? This is not a new debate. The search engine optimization world has long danced with 'white hat' versus 'black hat' tactics, and cloaking has remained firmly in the latter category. Rebranding it for AI does not change the structural dishonesty.

The downstream effects split unevenly across the ecosystem. Large publishers like Time gain a potential revenue stream at a moment when digital advertising faces existential pressure from AI summaries. Adtech intermediaries like Mobian get to sell a new product category. But smaller publishers without Time's scale may face a prisoner's dilemma: join the practice and risk platform penalties, or abstain and watch competitors capture AI-cited authority. For businesses buying these placements, the risk is brand safety at a meta level—being associated with a tactic that AI platforms publicly denounce could backfire more than any single favorable bot mention helps.

What to watch is whether Google and OpenAI follow Perplexity's lead or quietly tolerate the practice. Their commercial incentives are muddier: they need publisher content to train and feed their models, yet they also sell their own advertising products. A likely middle path involves these platforms developing their own sponsored content formats for AI responses, cutting out publishers entirely. For operators now, the actionable move is to audit what AI systems currently say about your business using tools like Perplexity or ChatGPT search, then improve your own website's clarity and structured data rather than paying intermediaries for artificial placement.

The deeper lesson is that every new technology layer gets colonized by old advertising tactics, and small businesses consistently pay the price for the experimentation phase. The brands testing Agent Ads—Ally Bank, Project Management Institute—have budgets to absorb failure and reputational risk. Most operators do not. Perplexity's intervention, whatever its own commercial motives, temporarily preserves a more level field where your business's actual information quality matters more than your ability to pay for hidden influence. That window will not stay open indefinitely.

“You can't just rebrand spam” — Business Insider

Takeaway: Audit what AI search says about your business directly, then improve your own site's clarity rather than paying for hidden influence.

Excerpt from the original — Business Insider

Norman Posselt/Getty Images/fStopA version of this post appears in the CMO Insider newsletter.Sign up for Business Insider's weekly marketing newsletter.Now the bots see them. Now they don't.Brands including Ally Bank and the Project Management Institute recently began testing ads on the publisher Time's website, specifically designed to be read by AI bots.The experiment sparked a lively ad industry debate: Could this nascent form of advertising grow into a credible channel, or would the practice be quickly thwarted by the AI platforms they are hoping to target?AI search company Perplexity decided it doesn't want to play ball.Digiday reported that Perplexity has begun preventing these ads from influencing its models. In a statement, the company warned publishers that running "deceptive advertising," such as this new format, could result in them being downranked in its search index.A …