UpTrajectory Review

Adapting to AI: Traits of Successful Project Managers

chess pieces beside calculator
Photo: cottonbro studio / Pexels

UpTrajectory Review

CIO Magazine reports that project managers are not becoming obsolete in the age of AI and automation, despite predictions to the contrary. The piece draws on commentary from Noah Fletcher, a partner at consultancy West Monroe, who argues that project managers are becoming more important, not less, as organizations navigate increasingly complex projects with higher stakes and faster delivery timelines. Fletcher emphasizes that the role is shifting toward finding the right investments, defining scope, and maintaining focus on quality and value. The article also references the Project Management Institute's Talent Triangle framework, which identifies three core competency areas: Ways of Working, Power Skills, and Business Acumen. The source text cuts off mid-sentence, suggesting the full article likely continues with additional traits and examples.

For small-business operators, this matters because project management is not a luxury reserved for enterprise IT departments. Whether you are implementing a new point-of-sale system, launching a marketing campaign, or managing a facility expansion, someone on your team is doing project management work, often without the title or training. The article's central claim — that AI handles routine tasks but cannot replace human judgment about scope, stakeholder alignment, and value — should resonate with owners who wear multiple hats. If you have been wondering whether to invest in project management discipline or tools, the answer here is yes, with a caveat: the value lies in strategic thinking, not in task tracking software alone.

What is genuinely useful in this piece is the pushback against the automation-replaces-everyone narrative. Fletcher's point that project managers are becoming more critical for 'finding the right things to invest in' and 'staying focused on value' cuts against the grain of most AI coverage, which tends to emphasize efficiency gains over judgment. We agree with this skepticism toward hype. The article's reliance on the PMI Talent Triangle feels like a safe, established framework that may understate how quickly AI tools are changing even the 'human' parts of the job. The claim that project managers need 'even more' than the PMI list suggests the framework itself may be lagging practice.

The second-order effects here split the audience. Experienced project managers in larger organizations may find validation in the article's argument that their role is secure and evolving upward. Small-business owners face a different reality: they cannot hire a dedicated project manager for every initiative, and the skills described — stakeholder management, business acumen, technical fluency — are spread across a lean team. This creates a training gap. If AI absorbs the routine scheduling and resource tracking, the remaining work demands higher-level judgment, which is harder to delegate and harder to teach. The cost of poor project selection and scope definition does not disappear with automation; it compounds.

Watch for how project management software vendors respond to this shift. If the human role is truly moving toward strategy and value definition, tools that merely automate task lists will lose relevance. Operators should evaluate whether their current project management approach helps them answer 'should we do this project at all' or only 'how do we track it.' A practical step: audit your last three major initiatives and identify where failures stemmed from scope, stakeholder misalignment, or resource scheduling. That diagnosis will tell you where to invest — in training, in better front-end decision-making, or in tools that support judgment rather than just tracking.

“As we move forward, the role of project manager is actually becoming increasingly important for finding the right things to invest in, defining scope, and staying focused on value” — CIO Magazine

Takeaway: Audit your last three major initiatives to find where failures came from scope, stakeholders, or resources, then invest there.

Excerpt from the original — CIO Magazine

Projects are becoming more complex, with higher stakes and faster delivery times.

At the same time automation and AI are changing how projects are designed, managed, and delivered. Indeed, some pieces of project management are now routinely handled by machines.

Some may think that AI and automation will make project managers obsolete, or at least less critical to project success. Executives say that’s not the case. Project managers are as important now as they ever were to project success.

“As we move forward, the role of project manager is actually becoming increasingly important for finding the right things to invest in, defining scope, and staying focused on value,” says Noah Fletcher, a partner in the operations excellence practice at consultancy West Monroe. “As we continue to accelerate, their value is really about quality — quality of what you’re trying to …